Repository Structure
The repository structure should reflect the architecture of the PrintPrice platform.
A clear structure improves discoverability, onboarding, maintenance, and operational reliability.
Objectives
A good repository structure should make it easier to understand:
- where core engines live
- where API surfaces are defined
- where shared contracts exist
- where infrastructure concerns are handled
- where documentation belongs
Common Structural Domains
A PrintPrice codebase may include domains such as:
- application entry points
- engine modules
- API routes
- shared schemas
- services
- workers
- infrastructure configuration
- documentation
- tests
These domains should remain easy to identify.
Separation by Responsibility
Repository structure should reinforce responsibility boundaries.
For example:
- pricing logic should not be mixed with UI concerns
- preflight processing should not be buried inside unrelated code
- integration adapters should remain distinct from core decision logic
This reduces accidental coupling.
Shared Contracts
Where multiple engines communicate, shared contracts should have a clearly defined location.
Examples include:
- request schemas
- response schemas
- normalized specification models
- compatibility result structures
This improves consistency across services.
Documentation Placement
Important repository-level documentation may include:
- architecture notes
- deployment guidance
- operational runbooks
- environment setup
- engineering conventions
These documents should be easy to find and keep aligned with implementation.
Test Organization
Tests should be structured in a way that mirrors the system design where practical.
Clear test organization helps identify coverage gaps and supports confident refactoring.
Growth Readiness
As the platform expands, repository structure should remain scalable.
That may involve:
- clearer package boundaries
- separate apps and workers
- modular engine folders
- dedicated integration layers
- explicit shared libraries
Long-Term Goal
The goal is not complexity for its own sake.
The goal is to make the repository understandable enough that engineers can safely evolve a production-critical platform over time.